Skip to main content

The Four Characters of Social Brands

The new web is all about relationships and social capital. Virtual communities have become an extension on our daily lives. We meet, contribute, collaborate, create and host events that help expand our social network. So where do brands fit in this context? What makes a brand social? And how social can a brand be?

I think brands follows the same principles as people do in their project interactions. We can define social brands in the same way we define individuals on a project. Every time we are planning events, we need to figure out who does what. For instance, let’s say that you are planning the next board meeting for your condo.  You will need to establish who is hosting the event. Who is bringing food and beverages? Do you want people to submit questions for the agenda?...

There is always going to be a tradeoff involved. The more control you are willing to give away, the more likely others will feel like part of the meeting. By the same token, ceding control elevates the risk of going off topic and not hitting your goals. It is a balancing act. Depending on your project goals, you will define how social the event is going to be.

Brands follow the same logic of our board-meeting example. A research done by the Center Advancement of Information Science Education (CAISE) in July 2009 on public participation on research projects establishes three types of groups: contribution, collaborative, co-created. Furthermore, Nina Simon in her book the Participatory Museum, which I highly recommend, applies the concept outside the science environment for customer engagement. She added a hosted category.  I will take this framework and apply it to characterize the social nature of a brand.

Do you have a contributor brand?  These brands tend to plan the end-to-end marketing program. They engage consumers by asking them to submit initiatives, so consumers can feel part of the brand. Consumers are not allowed to comment on others’ contributions. JetBlue is an example of a contributor brand, as it publishes consumer stories on its website.

Do you have a collaborative brand?  These brands also tend to plan marketing programs. However, consumers can not only submit content, they are also able to help define and shape the content through reviews, rankings, etc.  Amazon is a good example of a collaborative brand.



Do you have a co-created brand?  These brands engage consumers across most steps of the process. In other words, consumers are involved in the ideation, design and production of their marketing programs. A good example is Lego, which uses consumers’ ideas to develop new products. Plus, consumers can design their own lego.


 
Do you have a hosted brand? These brands basically create a platform to allow consumers to create their content. In this case, the brand function as a facilitator. Hosted brands still have rules to ensure quality of the content. Aggregators such as Linkedin and Wikipedia tend to be good examples of hosted brands.



What is the right social brand character? It depends on the brand’s goals. There aren’t right or wrong answers. However, the trend seems to be moving toward brands taking on more of a facilitator role rather than being the sole producers of content.

Comments

  1. Alberto - great insights on brands using social as a construction platform. i twittered this one.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Irrational Power of Nudge Brands

Nudge brands are brands built on interactions, not attitudes. They are mostly defined by experiences, not TV campaigns. They are designed around people's inconsistencies and errors, not for machines. They are simple, not complex. They like to break things into small chunks that are less daunting than big tasks. They focus on changing behavior, not generating awareness and interest. The Paris metro system card is a nudge brand. It is designed against human errors. You can use the card in any direction. IKEA is a nudge brand. It uses the power of personal investment. The more involved people are in creating something, the better they feel about the end product. Ryanair is a nudge brand. It chunks the whole purchase process. They lock you in with a low 'seat price' first to get a mental commitment. Then, they start to add the extra charges in bite-sized 'chunks.' Hare Krishna is a nudge brand. It is built on the reciprocity rule by giving away daisies. People should …

The Curse of Advertising Resources

With more platforms, more products and more content who are trying to reach a disengaged audience, it is becoming harder and harder for brands to stand out. Conventional practices are no longer working. People don't watch TV as much as they used to, so they don't see commercials.  They don't click on banner ads. They don't pay attention to billboards ads. And they don't trust brands' messages. Part of the problem is that we are too dependent on traditional ad resources, which limits the realm of our creativity. To thrive in this new environment, we, ironically, need the freedom of a tight brief: what can you do with no budget for mass media?  Or limited marketing communications dollars?  To make a comparison, traditional advertising is a lot like countries and economies that rely on oil. This reliance handicaps innovation. Countries with a vast amount of natural resources tend to have (1) less economic growth and (2) worse development rates than other countrie…

The Engineering of Digital Consent

Today, we build brands through social interactions. People opinions online shape our decisions on what brands should we buy or endorse. 90% of customers said that online reviews influence their buying decisions. Our challenge is that consumers don't pay attention and trust the message coming from brands. So, how do we affect the opinion of others in this environment? In marketing, we spend a lot of time and money creating advertising with the hope that it goes viral. However, most of the campaigns have little influence in today's consumers. Many campaigns have even the oppositive effect, with consumers sharing negative opinions or blocking advertising altogether. Changing behavior is hard. I don't think we have a silver bullet to influence people online, but we can learn best practices from behavioral science to increase our chances. Getting a little better in predicting behavior can make a big difference. Here are four behavioral principles that we should consider when c…