Skip to main content

The Virtual Immigrant: The Economics of Digital Goods


There is no doubt that social networks have made the diasporas closer to home. I remember when I first came to this country as student 12 years ago. At that time, I had to buy phone cards every week to call my family. Now, I connect with them for free almost on a daily bases through social networks or Skype. Furthermore, I keep in touch with friends across the world.

New media has empowered immigrants to go beyond a simple phone conversation. Now, they are in social networks and are sending pictures and videos via smart phones. Their families and friends at home are also consuming digital goods from the US.

This new dynamic has created a virtual immigrant: an immigrant who is not physically in their home country, but continues to consume culture, ideas and digital goods from home. I wonder what is the impact of this immigration? Are people more connected to their home countries? Are these virtual immigrants also consuming digital goods and ideas from abroad, by watching videos online, reading US newspapers, blogs, or downloading US music?

In 2008, eMarketers estimated a total of 23 million Hispanics online, which represents about 52% of the total US Hispanic population. We can break this number into three groups based on their levels of engagement online: Heavy, Medium and Light. According to a ComScore 2008 survey on Hispanic consumers online, the Heavy online users are predominately male, young, foreign born and prefer to speak Spanish in the house. The Medium users are generally young and more likely to be born in the US. They typically speak both English and Spanish at home. Finally, the Light users tend to be the oldest of the three groups. They are more acculturated and often prefer speaking English in the home.

The segmentation helps us understand the economics of digital goods for immigrant populations. While general market media through traditional channels is generally sufficient for reaching and engaging the Light users, there are unique opportunities for Heavy and Medium online segments.

If the Heavy online segment (HOS) represented countries rather than people, these countries would be considered net importers from their country of origin. They consume more digital goods or content relevant to their home countries than US content, e.g., Mexican telenovelas and newspapers,. To market to this group, we need to connect culturally to their home countries.

The Mediums online segments (MOS) are a hybrid. They are likely to be net exporters on balance though still importing many forms of media. I think media channels such as mun2, which targets 2nd generation Hispanics, hits the sweet spot. The channel features domestic US content but with Hispanic influence, such that it can be also exported abroad.

The MOS group is still proud of its Hispanic identity, but considers itself American. What makes this group even more relevant is that it is already big and expanding: 47% of Hispanic adults are US-born. They are also influencing other consumers abroad through sharing videos, photos, and games. Thus, they are connectors who share digital goods and content with their friends and family abroad. Marketing to this group can be very valuable, as engaging the MOS base can create a halo effect abroad.

In summary, virtual immigrants have changed the market for digital goods. Brands are becoming truly global as content is rapidly changing across countries. Net Importers such as the HOS are consuming more content from abroad. Net exporters are consuming tailored content and exporting to other countries.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…