Skip to main content

The New Shift: From Marcom to Markops


The new digital landscape is changing the role of marketing communications (marcom). The old model of marcom working in silos, separate from operations, is not longer sustainable. Social platforms and new technology are blurring the line between marcom and operations. Businesses that do a better job integrating these functions are more likely to succeed in this new environment. We can see great examples in customer-centric companies such as Zappos, Southwest, P&G and Apple. These companies connect marcom with customer service (e.g., Zappos & Southwest) and with operations/product development (e.g., P&G and Apple). We are likely to see the role of marketing operations increasing in relevance in today’s business world.

Marketing communications has traditionally been in the back seat of the corporate world. Tenures for CMOs tend to be short, with a limited seat at the table. They have been focused for the most part on communications. Finance and operations have traditionally led product development and customer service. Telecom, financial services, and the retail industry are good examples of this structure, with some exceptions. This model, however, no longer works in a digital and connected society. Business cannot longer manage what they “say” separately from what they “do”.

Technology has blended marcom with product development and customer service. Social media is customer service. Developing web platforms is product development. As a result, the best companies are shifting from marcom to marketing operations (markops). This new role will require new skills. To make this shift, marcom will need to become a Swiss army knife. They will need to be versed in analytics, technology, operations, and finance so that they can manage the “do” as much as the “say”. In other words, the new breed of marketers are likely to be generalists and cross-functional players in today’s digital society.

Comments

  1. Hey Alberto,

    Dunno if you remember me, but we worked together for a hot second back at Ogilvy on an education project for Lenovo.

    I really love your thinking here. Actually, I recently started an agency and this is basically the founding premise.

    We felt like if we were starting an agency we should be forward looking and try and capitalize on emerging market trends. We're finding now that we may be ahead of our time;it seems like more people we're talking to are still trying to grasp the introduction of social media and aren't really ready to talk about the implications, or what comes next.

    Does the jive with your experience, or do you feel like most marketing managers are hungry to hear about what's next? If so, how do I meet these people? :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Social platforms and new technology are blurring the line between marcom and operations." I actually expressed this very idea at a recent job interview. That we can no longer think of customer service as one silo and marketing as another. Or, content strategy, my field, as yet another. The analogy I've been using to describe this would be to think of a spider web. It's all interconnected and in more ways than traditionally conceived. Thanks for the post Alberto.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Social media, as it stands now, is entirely overvalued. Very few companies or celebrities have had success with it building their brands, yet everybody is wildly doing it. Look at a typical company's Facebook followers list and see how small it really is in the scheme of the big picture. Even Twitter has only worked well for a small few from the EARNED MEDIA it has brought.
    That's the real value in social media. Not the followers, not the fans. But old fashioned earned media that social media communications sometimes triggers. When you ignore the big picture, you end up just wasting a lot of money and man hours accomplishing nothing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…