Skip to main content

The New Shift: From Marcom to Markops


The new digital landscape is changing the role of marketing communications (marcom). The old model of marcom working in silos, separate from operations, is not longer sustainable. Social platforms and new technology are blurring the line between marcom and operations. Businesses that do a better job integrating these functions are more likely to succeed in this new environment. We can see great examples in customer-centric companies such as Zappos, Southwest, P&G and Apple. These companies connect marcom with customer service (e.g., Zappos & Southwest) and with operations/product development (e.g., P&G and Apple). We are likely to see the role of marketing operations increasing in relevance in today’s business world.

Marketing communications has traditionally been in the back seat of the corporate world. Tenures for CMOs tend to be short, with a limited seat at the table. They have been focused for the most part on communications. Finance and operations have traditionally led product development and customer service. Telecom, financial services, and the retail industry are good examples of this structure, with some exceptions. This model, however, no longer works in a digital and connected society. Business cannot longer manage what they “say” separately from what they “do”.

Technology has blended marcom with product development and customer service. Social media is customer service. Developing web platforms is product development. As a result, the best companies are shifting from marcom to marketing operations (markops). This new role will require new skills. To make this shift, marcom will need to become a Swiss army knife. They will need to be versed in analytics, technology, operations, and finance so that they can manage the “do” as much as the “say”. In other words, the new breed of marketers are likely to be generalists and cross-functional players in today’s digital society.

Comments

  1. Hey Alberto,

    Dunno if you remember me, but we worked together for a hot second back at Ogilvy on an education project for Lenovo.

    I really love your thinking here. Actually, I recently started an agency and this is basically the founding premise.

    We felt like if we were starting an agency we should be forward looking and try and capitalize on emerging market trends. We're finding now that we may be ahead of our time;it seems like more people we're talking to are still trying to grasp the introduction of social media and aren't really ready to talk about the implications, or what comes next.

    Does the jive with your experience, or do you feel like most marketing managers are hungry to hear about what's next? If so, how do I meet these people? :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Social platforms and new technology are blurring the line between marcom and operations." I actually expressed this very idea at a recent job interview. That we can no longer think of customer service as one silo and marketing as another. Or, content strategy, my field, as yet another. The analogy I've been using to describe this would be to think of a spider web. It's all interconnected and in more ways than traditionally conceived. Thanks for the post Alberto.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Social media, as it stands now, is entirely overvalued. Very few companies or celebrities have had success with it building their brands, yet everybody is wildly doing it. Look at a typical company's Facebook followers list and see how small it really is in the scheme of the big picture. Even Twitter has only worked well for a small few from the EARNED MEDIA it has brought.
    That's the real value in social media. Not the followers, not the fans. But old fashioned earned media that social media communications sometimes triggers. When you ignore the big picture, you end up just wasting a lot of money and man hours accomplishing nothing.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Curse of Advertising Resources

With more platforms, more products and more content who are trying to reach a disengaged audience, it is becoming harder and harder for brands to stand out. Conventional practices are no longer working. People don't watch TV as much as they used to, so they don't see commercials.  They don't click on banner ads. They don't pay attention to billboards ads. And they don't trust brands' messages. Part of the problem is that we are too dependent on traditional ad resources, which limits the realm of our creativity. To thrive in this new environment, we, ironically, need the freedom of a tight brief: what can you do with no budget for mass media?  Or limited marketing communications dollars?  To make a comparison, traditional advertising is a lot like countries and economies that rely on oil. This reliance handicaps innovation. Countries with a vast amount of natural resources tend to have (1) less economic growth and (2) worse development rates than other countrie…

The Irrational Power of Nudge Brands

Nudge brands are brands built on interactions, not attitudes. They are mostly defined by experiences, not TV campaigns. They are designed around people's inconsistencies and errors, not for machines. They are simple, not complex. They like to break things into small chunks that are less daunting than big tasks. They focus on changing behavior, not generating awareness and interest. The Paris metro system card is a nudge brand. It is designed against human errors. You can use the card in any direction. IKEA is a nudge brand. It uses the power of personal investment. The more involved people are in creating something, the better they feel about the end product. Ryanair is a nudge brand. It chunks the whole purchase process. They lock you in with a low 'seat price' first to get a mental commitment. Then, they start to add the extra charges in bite-sized 'chunks.' Hare Krishna is a nudge brand. It is built on the reciprocity rule by giving away daisies. People should …

The Irrational Challenger

Today, irrational is the new normal. People want products and services that break conventions and defy social norms. They have expectations that don't fit the traditional business model and feel irrational. However, they are very real and have created an irrational economy with irrational challengers. To thrive in this new playing field, business needs to be human, irrational. Think about it. Having a concierge to run our weekly errands for $99 month. Alfred. Ordering a healthy and delicious meal ready-to-eat under 7 minutes delivered at your door the next day. Hungryroot. Booking unlimited blowout appointments at salons in Manhattan for just $99 a month. Vive. (A typical blowout cost $40 to $90 inNew York City.) Renting a room on a month-to-month basis without going through the traditional methods of verifying applicants (e.g., two years of tax returns as proof of income).