Skip to main content

What is your “Like” currency policy?

“Like” is becoming the new trust currency. Publishing companies such as The New York Times and CNN are already using it to recommend and distribute content. NGOs, in partnership with sponsors, are leveraging “Like” for donations. For instance, if a NGO gets 100,000 “Likes” for a cause, the sponsor will kick in $100K. So, why not use “Like” to determine the price of digital goods?

To see how this might work, let’s use a publishing company for online books as an example. The publisher decides to use “Like” to help determine the price of its online books. “Like” will function as a floating currency on which the price is based on supply and demand. The more “Likes”, the lower the price. The publisher will need to establish a price base and ceiling in order to not lose money and remain competitive. In addition, they will need to determine the exchange rate of “Likes” to actual dollars. This exchange rate will need to be fair and transparent, so customers know what to expect for their “Likes”.

The beauty of this model is that it gives customers a say in the price they want to pay for a product. I think it is a win-win for customers and publishers. Customers have the opportunity to pay a lower price of something they “Like”. Publishers can sell more books and build a fan base.

I’d love to hear your ideas on how to use “Like” as a currency. Thanks-Alberto

Comments

  1. I LIKE the idea. However, will it work in an environment where trust and honesty are or possibly variable commodities?

    Will users be tempted to ask friends to LIKE a book to make it cheaper? On the other hand, will publishers be dishonest in order to make the book look popular?

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…