Skip to main content

Will people reject native advertising?

-->
People don’t read or watch advertising. They engage with content they like which might happen to be advertising.   Advertisers, publishers and journalists have yet to come to terms with “native” advertising, which is content produced or sponsored by advertisers in magazines, newspapers... For example, you can check out this article sponsored by Geico in Buzzfeed.  You can also watch Andrew Sullivan and Ben Smith live debate on native ads at social media week 2013. 

On one hand, some journalists and publishers argue that native advertising is bad. It is misleading and violates the consumer trust. People visit publishers’ sites such as The New York Times and Washington Post for unbiased information, not to be sold.

On the other hand, advertisers and some publishers argue that native advertising has been around forever in some shape or form.  As long as the content is properly labeled, it is fine. Plus, it helps pay the bills. Publishers have been struggling just to keep above water as revenue from print declines and digital fails to make up the difference.

I think there is fairness to both arguments. Publishers need to play a balancing act: Increase digital revenue without alienating their customer base. The current digital revenue model, which depends on display ads and/or subscription, is not working. Therefore, the reality is probably somewhere in the middle.  We should accept native advertising as long as it is not misleading, and more importantly, consumers see value in it.

We live in an era of branded entertainment. Consumers, especially millennials, who will compromise 75% of the workforce in 2025, are likely to accept this trade off as long as they get value out of it and don't feel misled. A recent study of millennials (Gen Y) from Edelman yielded some interesting insights relating to Branded Entertainment. Millennials want brands to entertain and help them. Consequently, in the future, native advertising should not be an isue as long as consumers get value out of the content.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Curse of Advertising Resources

With more platforms, more products and more content who are trying to reach a disengaged audience, it is becoming harder and harder for brands to stand out. Conventional practices are no longer working. People don't watch TV as much as they used to, so they don't see commercials.  They don't click on banner ads. They don't pay attention to billboards ads. And they don't trust brands' messages. Part of the problem is that we are too dependent on traditional ad resources, which limits the realm of our creativity. To thrive in this new environment, we, ironically, need the freedom of a tight brief: what can you do with no budget for mass media?  Or limited marketing communications dollars?  To make a comparison, traditional advertising is a lot like countries and economies that rely on oil. This reliance handicaps innovation. Countries with a vast amount of natural resources tend to have (1) less economic growth and (2) worse development rates than other countrie…

The Irrational Power of Nudge Brands

Nudge brands are brands built on interactions, not attitudes. They are mostly defined by experiences, not TV campaigns. They are designed around people's inconsistencies and errors, not for machines. They are simple, not complex. They like to break things into small chunks that are less daunting than big tasks. They focus on changing behavior, not generating awareness and interest. The Paris metro system card is a nudge brand. It is designed against human errors. You can use the card in any direction. IKEA is a nudge brand. It uses the power of personal investment. The more involved people are in creating something, the better they feel about the end product. Ryanair is a nudge brand. It chunks the whole purchase process. They lock you in with a low 'seat price' first to get a mental commitment. Then, they start to add the extra charges in bite-sized 'chunks.' Hare Krishna is a nudge brand. It is built on the reciprocity rule by giving away daisies. People should …

The Irrational Challenger

Today, irrational is the new normal. People want products and services that break conventions and defy social norms. They have expectations that don't fit the traditional business model and feel irrational. However, they are very real and have created an irrational economy with irrational challengers. To thrive in this new playing field, business needs to be human, irrational. Think about it. Having a concierge to run our weekly errands for $99 month. Alfred. Ordering a healthy and delicious meal ready-to-eat under 7 minutes delivered at your door the next day. Hungryroot. Booking unlimited blowout appointments at salons in Manhattan for just $99 a month. Vive. (A typical blowout cost $40 to $90 inNew York City.) Renting a room on a month-to-month basis without going through the traditional methods of verifying applicants (e.g., two years of tax returns as proof of income).