Skip to main content

A 2014 prediction: Still social, more personal

During the holidays, I sat down with a teenager to find out why his peers are running way from Facebook and embracing sites such as Snapchat. His response was simple: teens don’t want to broadcast their conversations and photos to everyone––especially not to their parents.  They want to talk and share only with the people they want, without leaving a digital “paper” trail.

The reality is that most social media sites have become “public squares”, places where everyone is “friends” of everyone in one way or another, a place where everything we say goes on record. This means that every time we post, we are broadcasting to the “masses” and going on record. 

This is not necessarily a bad thing.  We are social creatures by nature; we like to share with others and look to our community for support.  We want status, which is a basic human need. We have to claim our place in our tribe.  

But there is also a need for intimacy, a feeling of sharing exclusively with the people who are more likely to understand us.  The ones who are not going judge us. We also don’t want to be on record all the time. We are humans, and our emotions often dominate our logic.  This means that we are going to make mistakes and say stupid things that we are likely to regret.

The more we open our networks, the more people we reach, but also the less intimate and relevant our message becomes.  As we cruise toward 2014, our online and offline worlds continue to converge. Just as our “real life” relationships progress toward greater intimacy over time, the progression of our social media networks will naturally evolve into more niche groups that are more close and personal.  


Popular posts from this blog

The Irrational Power of Nudge Brands

Nudge brands are brands built on interactions, not attitudes. They are mostly defined by experiences, not TV campaigns. They are designed around people's inconsistencies and errors, not for machines. They are simple, not complex. They like to break things into small chunks that are less daunting than big tasks. They focus on changing behavior, not generating awareness and interest. The Paris metro system card is a nudge brand. It is designed against human errors. You can use the card in any direction. IKEA is a nudge brand. It uses the power of personal investment. The more involved people are in creating something, the better they feel about the end product. Ryanair is a nudge brand. It chunks the whole purchase process. They lock you in with a low 'seat price' first to get a mental commitment. Then, they start to add the extra charges in bite-sized 'chunks.' Hare Krishna is a nudge brand. It is built on the reciprocity rule by giving away daisies. People should …

The Curse of Advertising Resources

With more platforms, more products and more content who are trying to reach a disengaged audience, it is becoming harder and harder for brands to stand out. Conventional practices are no longer working. People don't watch TV as much as they used to, so they don't see commercials.  They don't click on banner ads. They don't pay attention to billboards ads. And they don't trust brands' messages. Part of the problem is that we are too dependent on traditional ad resources, which limits the realm of our creativity. To thrive in this new environment, we, ironically, need the freedom of a tight brief: what can you do with no budget for mass media?  Or limited marketing communications dollars?  To make a comparison, traditional advertising is a lot like countries and economies that rely on oil. This reliance handicaps innovation. Countries with a vast amount of natural resources tend to have (1) less economic growth and (2) worse development rates than other countrie…

The Engineering of Digital Consent

Today, we build brands through social interactions. People opinions online shape our decisions on what brands should we buy or endorse. 90% of customers said that online reviews influence their buying decisions. Our challenge is that consumers don't pay attention and trust the message coming from brands. So, how do we affect the opinion of others in this environment? In marketing, we spend a lot of time and money creating advertising with the hope that it goes viral. However, most of the campaigns have little influence in today's consumers. Many campaigns have even the oppositive effect, with consumers sharing negative opinions or blocking advertising altogether. Changing behavior is hard. I don't think we have a silver bullet to influence people online, but we can learn best practices from behavioral science to increase our chances. Getting a little better in predicting behavior can make a big difference. Here are four behavioral principles that we should consider when c…