Skip to main content

A 2014 prediction: Still social, more personal


During the holidays, I sat down with a teenager to find out why his peers are running way from Facebook and embracing sites such as Snapchat. His response was simple: teens don’t want to broadcast their conversations and photos to everyone––especially not to their parents.  They want to talk and share only with the people they want, without leaving a digital “paper” trail.

The reality is that most social media sites have become “public squares”, places where everyone is “friends” of everyone in one way or another, a place where everything we say goes on record. This means that every time we post, we are broadcasting to the “masses” and going on record. 

This is not necessarily a bad thing.  We are social creatures by nature; we like to share with others and look to our community for support.  We want status, which is a basic human need. We have to claim our place in our tribe.  

But there is also a need for intimacy, a feeling of sharing exclusively with the people who are more likely to understand us.  The ones who are not going judge us. We also don’t want to be on record all the time. We are humans, and our emotions often dominate our logic.  This means that we are going to make mistakes and say stupid things that we are likely to regret.


The more we open our networks, the more people we reach, but also the less intimate and relevant our message becomes.  As we cruise toward 2014, our online and offline worlds continue to converge. Just as our “real life” relationships progress toward greater intimacy over time, the progression of our social media networks will naturally evolve into more niche groups that are more close and personal.  

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…