Skip to main content

The making of a “liberator” brand


Routine is good, difference is bad. Happiness is eating the same breakfast every day. Welcome the “Routine Republic”, a fictional communist state ad produced by Taco Bell to reframe McDonald’s as an oppressive breakfast regime. Has Taco Bell gone too far? And most importantly, is it going to work?
The reality is that McDonald’s is a big corporation that commands the lion’s share of breakfast fast food category at 30% US market share. McDonald’s has a reputation for serving cheap and unhealthy food. And in some areas of the country, it might be the only affordable option for a meal.
Whether any of us enjoys a good McMuffin or not, this has all the ingredients for the making of a fictional “communist country”, a state-run monopoly that provides few options and low living standard to its citizens. Therefore, people are living in a state of compliance “routine” and need to defy the establishment to change their lives.
This sounds pretty close to the oppressive states in The Hunger Games orDivergent to me. To Taco Bell’s credit, there is method to its madness. Habits are hard to break. You need to get a person out of their stable mindset in order to make them open to new information. This technique is called “Disrupt & Reframe” in advertising.
Reframing McDonald’s as a communist state is trying to achieve that. Today, McDonald’s is a cultural code for America and by extension, for freedom and individual expression, which is the antithesis of a dictatorship. This opens the door to persuade people to defy their breakfast routine, McDonald’s, to find true individual expression in another option: Taco Bell.
The challenge is that things get too weird with the oppressive clown dictator to the point that I don't feel good about the ad. As a father of a three year old, I go every weekend to McDonald’s. My kid loves the toy in the happy meal and I take comfort that the french fries are balanced by apple slices and milk. The ad almost feels like a personal criticism. People tend to align their actions with their emotions. As a result, I believe this ad is more likely to disgust than to persuade people to change their breakfast routine.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…