Skip to main content

No Country for Mad Men



How much has advertising changed since the Mad Men era? A period when agencies spent months developing an advertising campaign – and drinking a lot of booze at the office – with the hope of changing a company’s future. While a lot has changed, the principles have not. We are still in the dying business of making ads rather than changing behavior.
They say that if your only tool is a hammer then every problem looks like a nail. Though slowly changing, agencies are still trying to solve every problem with ads using a traditional advertising model, AIDA (awareness, interest, desire, and action). While the AIDA model has its merits, it is hard to make it work in today’s fragmented, interactive and connected environment.
And here is why. First, you need to spend many months creating an advertising campaign. Most companies just don’t have the time. Then, you have to put a lot of money into media to push your message out with the hope that people will watch (awareness) and like it (interest). With the fragmentation of media and people’s short attention spans, it is increasingly hard to get your audience’s attention. Plus, you need to have the discipline to have a consistent message for the years to come. So people will remember the message and take action when it matters. This is hard to do when the average tenure of a CMO is only two years.
If you have deep pockets like GEICO, this model still works. GEICO spends nearly $1 billion annually on advertising. They have had a consistent message “15 minutes can save you 15% or more on car insurance” for almost 20 years. If you are not in this club, you might want to consider a different approach. You want to involve consumers with the brand through experiences.
Advertising needs to be in the business of changing behavior, not just making ads. The best way to change behavior is through experiences, which is about actions. Why? Actions change attitudes faster than attitudes change actions, as Adam Ferrier described in the Advertising Effect. People tend to align their feelings with their actions to justify their behavior. The principle is called cognitive dissonance in psychology. The best agencies capitalize on the fact that most of today’s media is interactive – it’s action-driven. It stimulates consumers to act in alignment with the brands interests, and the feelings follow.
In summary, there is no country for mad men anymore. To thrive in this new environment business needs to involve consumers with the brands as opposed to just telling them. To quote the famous Chinese proverb, "Tell me, and I forget; Teach me, and I may remember; Involve me, and I will learn.”

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…