Skip to main content

Wal-Mart, the unlikely activist


Wal-Mart recently joins other business leaders to protest the “Religion Freedom Restauration Act.” A law the opens the door for discrimination on a religion bases. For many people, this move comes as a surprise. Wal-Mart is known for the poor treatment of workers and low pay scale. What is driving this change; is it good business or social responsibility?
Wal-Mart is not in the business of making political statements. They are certainly not in the business of making enemies. They are in the business of selling products. Wal-Mart needs to appeal to a more diverse America. They have to recruit the best talent to stay competitive. And be inclusive with their suppliers, many of them have satellite offices in Arkansas. Furthermore, Wal-Mart needs an image shake up. While it gets good grades in price, it is failing in everything else.
American population is becoming majority non-white. We just have to look at Millennials, who are America’s most racially and ethnically diverse generation ever. More than four-in-ten are non-white, many the U.S.-bornchildren of the big wave of Hispanic and Asian immigrants who began arriving half a century ago according to the Pew Research Center. They are political and social liberal and are armed with social media to express their opinion.
In terms of image, Wal-Mart is in need of a remake. Wal-Mart ranks as the most dislike buying grocery according to Consumer Report Annual Supermarket Survey.They earned low marks in every category besides price; this includes quality of products and customer services. Taking a stand against the RFRA makes them more welcoming.
Corporate social responsibility is no longer a do-gooding sideshow. It has become the core of doing business. For Wal-Mart protesting the RFRA means good business for its customers, employees, and suppliers

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…