Skip to main content

The Full Stack “Advertising” Planner

The fragmentation of the communications landscape has created a complexity of channels, disciplines, and skill sets in the industry. Today, we have so many flavors of advertising agencies (e.g., digital, direct, PR, content, CRM, data agencies, mobile, brand, social media, innovation…) that it feels like going to a Baskin Robins store with 31 flavors to choose from.
The challenge is that the digital economy is pushing businesses to go cheaper, faster and better in this complex landscape. Companies need to prioritize velocity over perfection. Brands need to be always on to engage with consumers every day. Campaign cycles are running shorter, which makes it harder to architect a cohesive experience. On the other hand, people don’t differentiate the brand experience across channels. A bad experience it is still bad regardless of where it happens (Retail, Youtube, Facebook, Direct Mail, Call Center…) 
To reconcile the conflicting client needs of speed and specialization in a fragmented landscape, agencies and businesses need the rethink their approach to talent. To deliver the best work and customer experience, they need to move from specialists to generalists. They need full stack planners or marketers, people willing to bridge different worlds to deliver faster and more innovative solutions. 
In the ad agency world, this means planners that can bridge traditional brand planning with digital, UX, content and product development. A person who can help craft the brand story, develop a communications plan and architect the digital experience across channels. This does not mean that specialization does not matter.   Specialization is just going to be more relevant at the category level (e.g., healthcare, insurance, tourism, telecommunication…) rather than at the channel and discipline level. 
The counter argument that I normally get with this approach is that the environment is changing too fast. Therefore, you need specialists just to keep up with the technology and deliver the best work. While I get this point, I just don’t buy that people can only be good at one thing. Plus, channels are mushrooming so fast that it does not make sense to have people specialize in key channels or disciplines. If we needed one expert per channel, imagine the number of people we’d in the room to deliver on this approach and the time it would take to reach a consensus.
In summary, in today’s digital economy, brands need to innovate at a faster pace than ever to survive. They have a choice between being the disruptors or being disrupted. For brands to be nimble, they need their people to be nimble. This means exposing them to different kinds of thought and disciplines, to turn a concept into a finished product faster, cheaper and better.


Popular posts from this blog

The Irrational Power of Nudge Brands

Nudge brands are brands built on interactions, not attitudes. They are mostly defined by experiences, not TV campaigns. They are designed around people's inconsistencies and errors, not for machines. They are simple, not complex. They like to break things into small chunks that are less daunting than big tasks. They focus on changing behavior, not generating awareness and interest. The Paris metro system card is a nudge brand. It is designed against human errors. You can use the card in any direction. IKEA is a nudge brand. It uses the power of personal investment. The more involved people are in creating something, the better they feel about the end product. Ryanair is a nudge brand. It chunks the whole purchase process. They lock you in with a low 'seat price' first to get a mental commitment. Then, they start to add the extra charges in bite-sized 'chunks.' Hare Krishna is a nudge brand. It is built on the reciprocity rule by giving away daisies. People should …

The Curse of Advertising Resources

With more platforms, more products and more content who are trying to reach a disengaged audience, it is becoming harder and harder for brands to stand out. Conventional practices are no longer working. People don't watch TV as much as they used to, so they don't see commercials.  They don't click on banner ads. They don't pay attention to billboards ads. And they don't trust brands' messages. Part of the problem is that we are too dependent on traditional ad resources, which limits the realm of our creativity. To thrive in this new environment, we, ironically, need the freedom of a tight brief: what can you do with no budget for mass media?  Or limited marketing communications dollars?  To make a comparison, traditional advertising is a lot like countries and economies that rely on oil. This reliance handicaps innovation. Countries with a vast amount of natural resources tend to have (1) less economic growth and (2) worse development rates than other countrie…

The Engineering of Digital Consent

Today, we build brands through social interactions. People opinions online shape our decisions on what brands should we buy or endorse. 90% of customers said that online reviews influence their buying decisions. Our challenge is that consumers don't pay attention and trust the message coming from brands. So, how do we affect the opinion of others in this environment? In marketing, we spend a lot of time and money creating advertising with the hope that it goes viral. However, most of the campaigns have little influence in today's consumers. Many campaigns have even the oppositive effect, with consumers sharing negative opinions or blocking advertising altogether. Changing behavior is hard. I don't think we have a silver bullet to influence people online, but we can learn best practices from behavioral science to increase our chances. Getting a little better in predicting behavior can make a big difference. Here are four behavioral principles that we should consider when c…