Skip to main content

It's the Music, Stupid.


On July 8th, Apple unveils Apple Music, its subscription music service. For only $9.99 a month, you can access all the music you want in iTunes. Think about a Netflix for music. With this move, Apple is aiming at the 135 million streaming music listeners in the U.S., which is mostly owned by Spotify and Pandora.
Apple’s CEO Tim Cook positioned the service as having a “frightening advantage.” I will call it a Spotify killer. Spotify is the biggest on-demand streaming music service in the world and Apple most significant threat in the music space. Spotify has 75 million active users, 20 million of whom are paid subscribersThe Spotify business model relies on attracting users to a free service that offers a selection of music but with limited functionality, with the aim of converting those users to paying subscribers.
To defend its hegemony in the music industry, Apple is betting on "simplicity." If you have an iPhone, you are going to be one click away for accessing 20 million songs on your iTunes for only $9.99 per month, which is a much better deal than paying $0.99 per song. Your credit card is already in file. Apple Music will sync with your existing iTune’s library and all your Apple devices. My guess is that most of the hundred of millions of iTunes users are going to give it a try. 
To fend off Apple, Spotify has to compete on music, not features. Spotify needs to take a page from Netflix playbook and become a record label. They are already tipping their toes on managing rights. Spotify has started directly commissioning music that will encourage optimum exercise amongst its listeners. By becoming a full-fledged record label, they will own the exclusive rights of the signed artists. Listeners will be more likely to subscribe to Spotify to get access to music and videos from these artists. And signed artists will promote the platform to increase their reach. In other words, Spotify will create a close loop.

Being a content producer is working for Netflix, who created House of Cards, Orange is the New Black and Arrested Development. Why would it not work for Spotify? It might be the only option. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…