Skip to main content

Hacking Culture: Social Responsibility or Business?


On June 25th, the Supreme Court declared gay marriage legal; a controversial but welcoming decision for most of the American public. As the verdict came out, every business, even the ones with no history supporting gay equality, jumped on the bandwagon. They rainbow-colored their logo, products, and websites to celebrate the moment. While I am thrilled with the broad support of marriage equality, I wonder how much this is real versus opportunistic? And does it matter?
Today's people measure brands not by what they say, but by what they do. People trust brands that are authentic, not the ones that want to capitalize on the moment. The new generation, millennials, value authenticity as more important than content. 43% of millennials rank authenticity over content when consuming news. Furthermore, millennials believe that advertising is all spin and not authentic. Only 1% of millennials said that a compelling advertisement would make them trust a brand more. Therefore, using corporate social responsibility as a promotional tool does not work.
To gain people's trust, brands need to put their money where their mouth is. They need to make a sacrifice. For instance, CVS Caremark took a substantial financial hit when they decided to stop selling cigarettes in its drugstores. They could not claim to be a healthcare company while they sell products that kill people. Tesco, a supermarket in the UK, removed candies at the checkout counters in order to help customers to make healthier choices. Guinness pulled out of the NYC St. Patrick Day Parade over LGBT exclusion. In 2012, Google launched a campaign, supporting lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) rights around the world. 
Therefore, if the social cause is not part of the brand core values, it should not be promoted. We are living in a culture of the moment. Everyone is trying to capitalize on what’s trending, regardless if it aligns with the core principles, to get attention. The problem is that people are skeptical about brands and advertising. So, brands are going to be measured not by what they say but by what they do.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…