Skip to main content

Slow and fast marketing: Living in the fast lane

Today’s marketing strategies fall into two categories: the fast lane and the slow lane.  Fast marketing is all about harnessing the now: How a brand can be a part of customers' experiences in the moment. Slow marketing, on the other hand, focuses on redefining the brand experience, which requires a longer planning cycle. In the quest for short-term results, marketing is now living in the fast lane. Perhaps, it is time to slow down.
Many marketing strategies seem to be founded on the belief that in order to get attention, brands need to be injected into every relevant conversation. This marketing phenomenon happens frequently during major events (e.g., sports games, concerts) because marketers see an opportunity: A crowd is gathered around a common interest and the conversation has already been started for them, all the brand has to do is get the crowd’s attention by hijacking a hashtag . This is not to say that this is not a useful tactic, but just because we can join these conversations does not necessarily mean that we should.
And although I do believe that this strategy has value, it still does not go far enough to genuinely get people’s attention and, ultimately, change consumer behaviors. The first weakness of fast lane marketing is that everyone is doing it; native content or paid social is the new display banner. Second, people tend to discount brands’ messages on social media because they seem biased.  And last, but not least, people want control of their social newsfeeds, which could force social networks to rethink their approach to advertising.
Where fast track marketing lacks, slow track marketing is the strongest. Slow track marketing focuses on developing services and experiences that matter and, therefore, offers long-term solutions. But despite the lean startup methodology, creating these services takes time and hard work, which makes slow track marketing a lengthier and more challenging approach. It requires understanding audiences’ needs, developing value propositions that are unique and relevant for the brand, and creating experiences that stand out in the market.
To illustrate the strengths of slow lane marketing and why it is worth investing the effort and time into, let’s look at an example of slow and fast marketing: Would you be more likely to engage with a tennis brand that uses a billboard to provide in-depth analysis and stats of tennis players during a tournament (slow marketing) or with a brand hacking the tournament hashtag to promote themselves and offer coupons (fast marketing)?
While I understand the need for fast marketing, my concern is that we are only focusing on short-term results. We don’t want to slow down to rethink our audience needs, redefine our brand experience or develop new services that make a difference. Instead, we want instant gratification and fast results that aren't always sustainable. The problem is that just living in the fast lane might not pay off in the long run.  


Popular posts from this blog

The Irrational Power of Nudge Brands

Nudge brands are brands built on interactions, not attitudes. They are mostly defined by experiences, not TV campaigns. They are designed around people's inconsistencies and errors, not for machines. They are simple, not complex. They like to break things into small chunks that are less daunting than big tasks. They focus on changing behavior, not generating awareness and interest. The Paris metro system card is a nudge brand. It is designed against human errors. You can use the card in any direction. IKEA is a nudge brand. It uses the power of personal investment. The more involved people are in creating something, the better they feel about the end product. Ryanair is a nudge brand. It chunks the whole purchase process. They lock you in with a low 'seat price' first to get a mental commitment. Then, they start to add the extra charges in bite-sized 'chunks.' Hare Krishna is a nudge brand. It is built on the reciprocity rule by giving away daisies. People should …

The Curse of Advertising Resources

With more platforms, more products and more content who are trying to reach a disengaged audience, it is becoming harder and harder for brands to stand out. Conventional practices are no longer working. People don't watch TV as much as they used to, so they don't see commercials.  They don't click on banner ads. They don't pay attention to billboards ads. And they don't trust brands' messages. Part of the problem is that we are too dependent on traditional ad resources, which limits the realm of our creativity. To thrive in this new environment, we, ironically, need the freedom of a tight brief: what can you do with no budget for mass media?  Or limited marketing communications dollars?  To make a comparison, traditional advertising is a lot like countries and economies that rely on oil. This reliance handicaps innovation. Countries with a vast amount of natural resources tend to have (1) less economic growth and (2) worse development rates than other countrie…

The Engineering of Digital Consent

Today, we build brands through social interactions. People opinions online shape our decisions on what brands should we buy or endorse. 90% of customers said that online reviews influence their buying decisions. Our challenge is that consumers don't pay attention and trust the message coming from brands. So, how do we affect the opinion of others in this environment? In marketing, we spend a lot of time and money creating advertising with the hope that it goes viral. However, most of the campaigns have little influence in today's consumers. Many campaigns have even the oppositive effect, with consumers sharing negative opinions or blocking advertising altogether. Changing behavior is hard. I don't think we have a silver bullet to influence people online, but we can learn best practices from behavioral science to increase our chances. Getting a little better in predicting behavior can make a big difference. Here are four behavioral principles that we should consider when c…