Skip to main content

Renaming Advertising Week


Last week, we celebrated Advertising week XII, the world premier gathering of advertising and communications leaders.  If we look at this year's agenda, Ad week is becoming less about ads and more about well everything else; digital, media, content, innovation, data, social and platforms. No wonder Martin Sorrell suggested to rename advertising to reflect the new reality. 
So, let's start by trying to  rename advertising week. What should we call it? A good name should be relevant and unique. So let's look at a few options:
Digital Week might be a trendy alternative, but it does not cover all the channels (e.g., TV, radio, etc.). Digital is not unique to advertising and communication since it goes across multiple industries. In other words, Digital Week might be a relevant option but it is not unique. 
Audience Week might be an attractive choice. The name covers the full spectrum of disciplines for advertising and communications. But that being said, anyone can claim it since we all aspire to be customer centric. So while Audience week is relevant, it's not differentiating enough. 
Experience Week is a good option. We are living in the era of "now." Most brands are trying to be contextually relevant and, consequently, are focusing on creating experiences that matter to their customers. As a result, everything is an experience today. While experiences are extremely relevant to what we to do, it's a name and sentiment that can also be claimed by almost by every sector. 
Finally: (and this is my top choice) Creative week.  At the core, advertising and communication are about creating differentiation through creativity. The problem is that we have a limited view of creativity. We think about creative in terms of producing ad units. Creativity is a mindset, which requires bridging art and science. I believe that we need to expand our definition to include all the possibilities (e.g., digital, media and data). While other industries can claim creativity, advertising, and communications agencies are in a unique position to own it. And they have the heritage, talent, process and expertise to do just that.
In summary, we are living in the idea economy, where human interaction and creativity bring disparate things together in order to solve problems. This is a critical skill set to have, especially as jobs that require repetitive tasks are being automated.  Having creativity at the heart of the business not only provides a point of differentiation, but it also has a bright future in this new economy. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…