Skip to main content

The Intimate Web



We are moving to a new type of web experience. One that not only knows what you do, but it also knows how you feel and think. A true human web experience powered by wearable devices that involve physical or emotional intimacy. This new web is going to allow a social network of people to form a strong emotional connection, but it might also isolate them from legitimate, warm human contact. 
Today, we are living in the era of the now. People want to share and participate in digital experiences that are contextually relevant.  The rise of mobile technology in concert with social and big data have enabled us to harness the moment: we can attach content from digital locations, add songs to shareable maps, attach memories to physical locations, and feature site-specific site experiences. 
The new intimate web will make these personalized experiences, that are already contextually relevant, more intimate. Why? Intimate relationships play a central role in the overall human experience. Humans have a general desire to belong and to love, which is usually satisfied within an intimate relationship. These relationships involve feelings of liking or loving one or more people, romance, physical or sexual attraction, sexual relationships, or emotional and personal support between the members. So, an intimate web is just a natural evolution of today's contextual web. 
Paradoxically, the more connected we get, the more disconnected we become. Technology helps us get in touch while simultaneously preventing us from being in touch.  An intimate web will further enable correspondence but will also prevent us from being understood. It's easier to confront a computer than a person when dealing with conflict.  And as we become overly dependent on technology, personal conflicts might become more rampant because we've lost an ability to independently communicate our own thoughts and feelings. 
To create this intimate web, feeling, thoughts and actions are going to be seamlessly integrated across the offline and online world. In other words, what we think, feel and do is going to become real online. This new web is not too far away. Below are a few examples of how these intimated web experiences are being manifested today. And we are just getting started.  
Think. We are going to search, click, order or move things with our minds through the use of wearable devices.  Our brain signal will control machines and devices like a computer or robotic limb. 
Brain-computer interfaces have made significant progress as of late, thanks in part to companies like OpenBCI, whose co-founder recently shared his thoughts on the surging BCI movement with MAKE Magazine.
“Though BCI is in an embryonic state — with a definition that evolves by the day — it’s typically a system that enables direct communication between a brain and a computer, and one.
Feel. We are going to share our heartbeat, stress levels or pulse rates to reflect how we feel about ourselves, another person, a brand or situation. In other words, we are going to have true likes or dislikes. 
Apple watch features capability for a user to send their "heartbeat" to another wearer. 

Olive bracelets discretely provide stress managing prompts. 
 Do.  We are going to use our voice, eyes and moves to command online actions.
We already have Amazon Echo, also known as Alexa, which is a voice command device from Amazon.com with functions including question answering, playing music and controlling smart devices.  
 With Google glass, we can take videos, give you turn-by-turn directions, make phone calls, or search the Web with a blink of the eye. 
 In summary, this new web will create human's connection at a deeper level. The walls between offline and online world are going to vanish. An intimate network will create stronger connections with the world, but it might also isolate us from the warm human touch. The closer we get online, the farther we get offline. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…