Skip to main content

The People Economy

As this year comes to an end, we are all trying to predict what's going to be "hot" in 2016.  I've already heard a few terms and buzzwords like hyperconnectivity and micro-moment floating around. And while there is truth in all of these trends, they're all heavily focused on the technology side. I think there's another angle that we are overlooking: the human side.  I believe that next year is going to be about the person, not the brand or the corporation or the publisher. What it boils down to is that new tools and technology can make experiences personal again, which redirects the focus to people. And brands that put people first are more likely to succeed in this new environment. 
We live in the era of disengagement. It's a world where society has lost faith in the system (politics, work, faith and corporations) but not in the people.  
In politics, defections from political parties have doubled in the past 50 years, which is largely because political parties can't seem to agree on anything.
According to Gallup research, 7 out of 10 employees aren't engaged in their work at the office and they don't feel their work is meaningful enough. 
The exit from religious affiliations has doubled in the past 20 years.  
Most of the new generations don't trust message coming from brands because they see brands as being self-interested and view their messages as being financially motivated.
All of these factors are forcing people to take ownership of their lives. There is no guaranteed job anymore. The state is not likely to take care of you. Your partner might not stick around. I know these scenarios sound a bit depressing, but they reflect the reality of the situation.
There is a silver lining: Today, people have access to platforms that can help jump-start their business at a scale and with almost no cost.  We can call it the people economy, where the face of the organization is the people and not the corporation. This economy tends to be driven by brands that put people first.  
The face of Huffington Post isn't the Huffington Post, it's the writers. People have access to these journalists via personal profiles and social media that enable readers to have a dialogue with them. 
The face of LinkedIn isn't LinkedIn, it's all of their members-- like me-- who have profiles, post articles and are engaged through comments, likes or messages. 
The face of Skillshare is not Skillshare, it's the thousands of people who are teaching classes. 
The face of Lending Club isn't Lending Club, it's both the people who you can invest in and the investors. You know users' names and their history, which fortifies trust that they will pay you back for your loan.
People care about people, not products. When a society loses faith in the system, they go to the foundation: the people that share their values and beliefs. Technology has the power to take us apart and bring us together again. But in times of disengagement, we need a human face. 


Popular posts from this blog

The Irrational Power of Nudge Brands

Nudge brands are brands built on interactions, not attitudes. They are mostly defined by experiences, not TV campaigns. They are designed around people's inconsistencies and errors, not for machines. They are simple, not complex. They like to break things into small chunks that are less daunting than big tasks. They focus on changing behavior, not generating awareness and interest. The Paris metro system card is a nudge brand. It is designed against human errors. You can use the card in any direction. IKEA is a nudge brand. It uses the power of personal investment. The more involved people are in creating something, the better they feel about the end product. Ryanair is a nudge brand. It chunks the whole purchase process. They lock you in with a low 'seat price' first to get a mental commitment. Then, they start to add the extra charges in bite-sized 'chunks.' Hare Krishna is a nudge brand. It is built on the reciprocity rule by giving away daisies. People should …

The Curse of Advertising Resources

With more platforms, more products and more content who are trying to reach a disengaged audience, it is becoming harder and harder for brands to stand out. Conventional practices are no longer working. People don't watch TV as much as they used to, so they don't see commercials.  They don't click on banner ads. They don't pay attention to billboards ads. And they don't trust brands' messages. Part of the problem is that we are too dependent on traditional ad resources, which limits the realm of our creativity. To thrive in this new environment, we, ironically, need the freedom of a tight brief: what can you do with no budget for mass media?  Or limited marketing communications dollars?  To make a comparison, traditional advertising is a lot like countries and economies that rely on oil. This reliance handicaps innovation. Countries with a vast amount of natural resources tend to have (1) less economic growth and (2) worse development rates than other countrie…

The Engineering of Digital Consent

Today, we build brands through social interactions. People opinions online shape our decisions on what brands should we buy or endorse. 90% of customers said that online reviews influence their buying decisions. Our challenge is that consumers don't pay attention and trust the message coming from brands. So, how do we affect the opinion of others in this environment? In marketing, we spend a lot of time and money creating advertising with the hope that it goes viral. However, most of the campaigns have little influence in today's consumers. Many campaigns have even the oppositive effect, with consumers sharing negative opinions or blocking advertising altogether. Changing behavior is hard. I don't think we have a silver bullet to influence people online, but we can learn best practices from behavioral science to increase our chances. Getting a little better in predicting behavior can make a big difference. Here are four behavioral principles that we should consider when c…