Skip to main content

The People Economy


As this year comes to an end, we are all trying to predict what's going to be "hot" in 2016.  I've already heard a few terms and buzzwords like hyperconnectivity and micro-moment floating around. And while there is truth in all of these trends, they're all heavily focused on the technology side. I think there's another angle that we are overlooking: the human side.  I believe that next year is going to be about the person, not the brand or the corporation or the publisher. What it boils down to is that new tools and technology can make experiences personal again, which redirects the focus to people. And brands that put people first are more likely to succeed in this new environment. 
We live in the era of disengagement. It's a world where society has lost faith in the system (politics, work, faith and corporations) but not in the people.  
In politics, defections from political parties have doubled in the past 50 years, which is largely because political parties can't seem to agree on anything.
According to Gallup research, 7 out of 10 employees aren't engaged in their work at the office and they don't feel their work is meaningful enough. 
The exit from religious affiliations has doubled in the past 20 years.  
Most of the new generations don't trust message coming from brands because they see brands as being self-interested and view their messages as being financially motivated.
All of these factors are forcing people to take ownership of their lives. There is no guaranteed job anymore. The state is not likely to take care of you. Your partner might not stick around. I know these scenarios sound a bit depressing, but they reflect the reality of the situation.
There is a silver lining: Today, people have access to platforms that can help jump-start their business at a scale and with almost no cost.  We can call it the people economy, where the face of the organization is the people and not the corporation. This economy tends to be driven by brands that put people first.  
The face of Huffington Post isn't the Huffington Post, it's the writers. People have access to these journalists via personal profiles and social media that enable readers to have a dialogue with them. 
The face of LinkedIn isn't LinkedIn, it's all of their members-- like me-- who have profiles, post articles and are engaged through comments, likes or messages. 
The face of Skillshare is not Skillshare, it's the thousands of people who are teaching classes. 
The face of Lending Club isn't Lending Club, it's both the people who you can invest in and the investors. You know users' names and their history, which fortifies trust that they will pay you back for your loan.
People care about people, not products. When a society loses faith in the system, they go to the foundation: the people that share their values and beliefs. Technology has the power to take us apart and bring us together again. But in times of disengagement, we need a human face. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…