Skip to main content

What's your 2016 conversation strategy?


There isn't a marketing meeting that goes by without the mention of content marketing. It's a silver bullet for all marketing problems as people are blocking or not paying attention to ads. So instead of giving the same content and in the same way, we are trying to give something of value instead, which is a well-intended attempt to overcome the problem at hand. But it needs something else. The challenge is that digital is a live channel, not a static one and content without conversation is a one-way street. To build a relationship with our audience, we need to move beyond content and get into a conversation and truly engage them. 
I understand that many people might consider content and conversation to be one in the same, but I dare to differ. We can push all of the content in the world and still not have a conversation. Newspapers and publishers do that in their print and TV and, to some extent, in digital. Today, most of the media is interactive. The expectation is for people to have a conversation in real-time. As this expectation continues to evolve, it is becoming more and more apparent that just pushing content isn't a good enough strategy. We need a conversation strategy that takes into accounts: context, content and an audience's ability to respond in real time. Let's unpack these three terms and their implications. 
Context is about relevancy. The environment shapes the conversation. 
If you're ordering coffee early in the morning, you're probably ordering it because coffee helps to start your day. In that situation, communication should be about coffee in the context of starting or planning for the day and not just about the taste of coffee or a 15% discount on a cup of joe. 
But the conversation changes if someone orders coffee in the evening because they're ordering the drink to keep them going through the night. In this case, the communication should be about coffee giving an extra boost to get things done. 
Content is about advancing the conversation. Otherwise, it can easily become disruptive or annoying. 
Sticking with the coffee example, if you plan to use the idea that coffee is a kickstarter to your day, then you might want to consider providing additional content that deepens the conversation. This could be something like an inspirational quote or tips on how to get the most out of your day. 
But if you're talking about coffee as a way to keep you going through the night, you might want to consider including recommendations on songs that will keep you motivated during those late hours at the office. 
Finally, the ability to respond and react in the moment is what make us human. It's what actually builds relationships. 
It's great to provide tips to help your audience to get through the day, but it's even better to have a conversation about the tips or songs that resonate the most with them and how they made a difference. This builds a relationship and keeps the conversation going-- it shows that you are invested in the conversation and learning more about them. 
In summary, digital is live so it's all about context. Digital is a medium so it focuses on content. And, most importantly, digital is human so it's a genuine conversation with people. To build a human brand, we need to have a human conversation.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…