Skip to main content

Will Live Integration Drive Brand Engagement in 2016?


Sharing a recent interview that I did with OgilvyOne NewYork on what to expect in brand strategy and engagement in 2016. You can visit our blog, Sell or Else, for more resources on customer engagement. 
OgilvyOne: From a brand strategy and engagement perspective, what was hot in 2015?
Brea: 2014 was about content marketing. People are not paying attention to ads. So instead of giving more of the same, we were, and are still trying, to provide something of higher perceived value in the form of content.
2015 has been about contextual marketing, which bases communications on the place and the situation the consumer is in. Today, 77% of content is consumed through interactive devices. So even though we are still pushing communications through mass media, people are engaging with the content on their mobile devices in a way that’s personal and contextually relevant.
OO: How is this forecasted to change in 2016?
Brea: We are moving from doing personalized and contextually relevant communications on a few occasions to doing them consistently across all touch points in 2016. This is going to be hard, given the fragmentation of the media landscape and the high bar of customer expectations. 2016 is going to be about live integration.
Live integration is about not just maintaining relevancy and personalization across all touch points, but doing it in a seamless way for our customers. 
OO: How would you advise brands to set themselves apart in the next year?
Brea: Brands need purpose and action to set themselves apart.
We are living in the age of disengagement. An era in which people don’t invest time, effort or emotions at work or at home, in politics or in religion. They have lost faith in the system. Perhaps inequality and dysfunctional politics are sucking up all the energy from society. People are taking actions on their own and holding business accountable to higher standards.
This trend impacts culture, business, and everyday life.
According to Gallup research, 7 out of 10 employees aren’t engaged in their work at the office. Defections from political parties have doubled in the past 50 years. Even more dramatically, exits from religious affiliations have doubled in the past 20 years.
Disengagement has engulfed society, which poses a huge challenge for marketers. How do we engage with people who don’t want to be engaged? Think about it.
Only brands that have a highly developed sense of purpose and that will improve our lives, or the world, will survive. Today, 63% of consumers only buy products and services that appeal to their beliefs, values or ideals, according to GFK.
But having a sense of purpose does not mean anything without meaningful action. There’s a lot of distrust of brands, and confusion as to what they really stand for. In order to gain trust, a company’s ideals and actions need to perfectly align. This is why brand experience – consistently delivering on the brand promise across all touch points – is also critical to set brands apart. Today, brands don’t get a second chance.
 OO: How can brands create a unified, seamless experience for consumers when new channels are constantly emerging?
Brea: The first step is creating a strong foundation for the brand via the Value Proposition or Brand Promise. The brand promise gives the brand a strong sense of purpose and creates relevancy with its audience.
The second step is ensuring that the Experience of the brand carries throughout the entire customer journey. The importance of this has been recently demonstrated by appointments of “Chief Experience Officers,” who will ensure consistency across all platforms. There is a challenge in integrating branding throughout these platforms, and it only gets more difficult as companies grow – but customers are looking for a consistent experience from brands.
And the third step is Enablement. How a brand enables value and experience is essential to reaching your audience at multiple touch points.
We live, breathe and eat through our mobile devices. We call a taxi, reserve tables, buy groceries, order clothes and watch movies – all on our phones. Our smartphones know who we are, where we are and what we did last week. People expect the content’s message to be personalized to the moment that they are experiencing. And more importantly, consumers need to be able to interact with the content through their smartphones.
OO:  What do you think will be the biggest concern for brands in the upcoming year?
Brea: Keeping things simple. Today, we have more choices than ever. However, people still only have 24 hours in a day. In times of abundance, simplicity is the scarce resource. People are looking for brands that make their lives simple, painless and without complexity. Simplicity wins in a complex world. People don’t have the time to figure out how things work – and don’t want to. As marketers, our challenge and opportunity is to have the discipline and focus to be simple and consistent in what we say and do.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Irrational Power of Nudge Brands

Nudge brands are brands built on interactions, not attitudes. They are mostly defined by experiences, not TV campaigns. They are designed around people's inconsistencies and errors, not for machines. They are simple, not complex. They like to break things into small chunks that are less daunting than big tasks. They focus on changing behavior, not generating awareness and interest. The Paris metro system card is a nudge brand. It is designed against human errors. You can use the card in any direction. IKEA is a nudge brand. It uses the power of personal investment. The more involved people are in creating something, the better they feel about the end product. Ryanair is a nudge brand. It chunks the whole purchase process. They lock you in with a low 'seat price' first to get a mental commitment. Then, they start to add the extra charges in bite-sized 'chunks.' Hare Krishna is a nudge brand. It is built on the reciprocity rule by giving away daisies. People should …

The Curse of Advertising Resources

With more platforms, more products and more content who are trying to reach a disengaged audience, it is becoming harder and harder for brands to stand out. Conventional practices are no longer working. People don't watch TV as much as they used to, so they don't see commercials.  They don't click on banner ads. They don't pay attention to billboards ads. And they don't trust brands' messages. Part of the problem is that we are too dependent on traditional ad resources, which limits the realm of our creativity. To thrive in this new environment, we, ironically, need the freedom of a tight brief: what can you do with no budget for mass media?  Or limited marketing communications dollars?  To make a comparison, traditional advertising is a lot like countries and economies that rely on oil. This reliance handicaps innovation. Countries with a vast amount of natural resources tend to have (1) less economic growth and (2) worse development rates than other countrie…

The Engineering of Digital Consent

Today, we build brands through social interactions. People opinions online shape our decisions on what brands should we buy or endorse. 90% of customers said that online reviews influence their buying decisions. Our challenge is that consumers don't pay attention and trust the message coming from brands. So, how do we affect the opinion of others in this environment? In marketing, we spend a lot of time and money creating advertising with the hope that it goes viral. However, most of the campaigns have little influence in today's consumers. Many campaigns have even the oppositive effect, with consumers sharing negative opinions or blocking advertising altogether. Changing behavior is hard. I don't think we have a silver bullet to influence people online, but we can learn best practices from behavioral science to increase our chances. Getting a little better in predicting behavior can make a big difference. Here are four behavioral principles that we should consider when c…