Skip to main content

Will Live Integration Drive Brand Engagement in 2016?


Sharing a recent interview that I did with OgilvyOne NewYork on what to expect in brand strategy and engagement in 2016. You can visit our blog, Sell or Else, for more resources on customer engagement. 
OgilvyOne: From a brand strategy and engagement perspective, what was hot in 2015?
Brea: 2014 was about content marketing. People are not paying attention to ads. So instead of giving more of the same, we were, and are still trying, to provide something of higher perceived value in the form of content.
2015 has been about contextual marketing, which bases communications on the place and the situation the consumer is in. Today, 77% of content is consumed through interactive devices. So even though we are still pushing communications through mass media, people are engaging with the content on their mobile devices in a way that’s personal and contextually relevant.
OO: How is this forecasted to change in 2016?
Brea: We are moving from doing personalized and contextually relevant communications on a few occasions to doing them consistently across all touch points in 2016. This is going to be hard, given the fragmentation of the media landscape and the high bar of customer expectations. 2016 is going to be about live integration.
Live integration is about not just maintaining relevancy and personalization across all touch points, but doing it in a seamless way for our customers. 
OO: How would you advise brands to set themselves apart in the next year?
Brea: Brands need purpose and action to set themselves apart.
We are living in the age of disengagement. An era in which people don’t invest time, effort or emotions at work or at home, in politics or in religion. They have lost faith in the system. Perhaps inequality and dysfunctional politics are sucking up all the energy from society. People are taking actions on their own and holding business accountable to higher standards.
This trend impacts culture, business, and everyday life.
According to Gallup research, 7 out of 10 employees aren’t engaged in their work at the office. Defections from political parties have doubled in the past 50 years. Even more dramatically, exits from religious affiliations have doubled in the past 20 years.
Disengagement has engulfed society, which poses a huge challenge for marketers. How do we engage with people who don’t want to be engaged? Think about it.
Only brands that have a highly developed sense of purpose and that will improve our lives, or the world, will survive. Today, 63% of consumers only buy products and services that appeal to their beliefs, values or ideals, according to GFK.
But having a sense of purpose does not mean anything without meaningful action. There’s a lot of distrust of brands, and confusion as to what they really stand for. In order to gain trust, a company’s ideals and actions need to perfectly align. This is why brand experience – consistently delivering on the brand promise across all touch points – is also critical to set brands apart. Today, brands don’t get a second chance.
 OO: How can brands create a unified, seamless experience for consumers when new channels are constantly emerging?
Brea: The first step is creating a strong foundation for the brand via the Value Proposition or Brand Promise. The brand promise gives the brand a strong sense of purpose and creates relevancy with its audience.
The second step is ensuring that the Experience of the brand carries throughout the entire customer journey. The importance of this has been recently demonstrated by appointments of “Chief Experience Officers,” who will ensure consistency across all platforms. There is a challenge in integrating branding throughout these platforms, and it only gets more difficult as companies grow – but customers are looking for a consistent experience from brands.
And the third step is Enablement. How a brand enables value and experience is essential to reaching your audience at multiple touch points.
We live, breathe and eat through our mobile devices. We call a taxi, reserve tables, buy groceries, order clothes and watch movies – all on our phones. Our smartphones know who we are, where we are and what we did last week. People expect the content’s message to be personalized to the moment that they are experiencing. And more importantly, consumers need to be able to interact with the content through their smartphones.
OO:  What do you think will be the biggest concern for brands in the upcoming year?
Brea: Keeping things simple. Today, we have more choices than ever. However, people still only have 24 hours in a day. In times of abundance, simplicity is the scarce resource. People are looking for brands that make their lives simple, painless and without complexity. Simplicity wins in a complex world. People don’t have the time to figure out how things work – and don’t want to. As marketers, our challenge and opportunity is to have the discipline and focus to be simple and consistent in what we say and do.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…