Skip to main content

Brand Judgement in a Blink of an Eye


You are probably familiar with the expression; You only get one chance to make a good first impression.  But can people really create an accurate perception of your brand in a blink of an eye? And what does that flash view of your brand mean for your online brand image?  
In today's smartphone era, this is the dilemma that brands are facing. People have shorter attention spans than goldfish. Human attention span has lowered to 8 seconds due to digital technology. Most of the consumer interaction with brands happens through social apps. People engage with brands as they scroll through Facebook, look at pictures on Instagram, and watch Snapchat videos - which last for just a few seconds. This poses the question; how fast can brands make an impression with consumers? 

Individuals can make accurate judgments with surprising speed and sensitivity. A balancing view of social perception is that, in regards to time, on one hand we are influenced by context and past experiences, and on the other hand, we operate with surprising efficiency. 

In 2011, a remarkable study, published by Nalini Ambady, asked people to rate college yearbook photos in a variety of dimensions. Some of these dimensions affected in how powerful the people in the pictures seem to be. The photos were all cropped, so only the person's face was visible. All of the photos were the same size. The main finding from the research was that social judgment based on how powerful the person looked in college was related to how successful that person was 20 to 50 years later. That's an astonishing degree of precision based on a social judgment made from one black and white photo. 

Let me give you another example, John Gotman, a relationship researcher at the University of Washington invited 120 newlywed couples to visit his laboratory and be videotaped while discussing an ongoing issue in their marriage. Strangers rated these videos on how many positive or negative emotions the couple displayed in the first couple of minutes in the lab. The social judgment result of the 3-minute marital interaction predicted which couple ended up being divorced six years later. 

This is known in psychology as a thin slide of behavior. A brief sample of behavior can provide accurate judgment with surprising speed and sensitivity. In fact, other studies have shown that people can predict the outcome of an election when viewing photos of the candidates for a quarter of a second. Even when we only showed people headshots, they still predicted the winner 62% of the time. 

There are many reasons as to why we think this might happen. One view is that we know how we feel before we are aware of why we feel. In other words, we are wired to process emotions faster than cognitions. Regardless of the situation, social judgment can happen with precise accuracy and speed. And once we form an opinion, we tend to lock in and look for confirming evidence rather than challenging the judgment we already made. 

In summary, brand judgment can happen in a blink of an eye. A two-second exposure to a social media profile or video on Facebook can determine someone's perception of a brand, from the very first encounter. In today's digital world, every touch point matters, even if it is for a quarter of a second because you might never get a second chance to create a first impression.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…