Skip to main content

The Economy of Simplicity


In marketing, we have two ways to get people to buy our products; increasing motivation and making things easier.
Historically, we tend to default to motivation since it is what we know best. We create communication that hits an emotional nerve to gain a strong association in the consumers' minds.
When done right, emotional advertising works even without people knowing it. Customers just need to be exposed to an ad for a period of time. Motivation, however, requires willpower, which is hard to maintain. Anybody who has ever gone on a diet knows this all too well. In the morning, you wake up motivated to eat well, but by the afternoon, motivation hits rock bottom, and you eat up three chocolate chip cookies courtesy of a co-worker.
Ease, on the other hand, focuses on giving people the ability and opportunity to take action. We do that by removing barriers or providing the skills to take the desired behavior. Contrary to motivation, ease does not require willpower. Once we removed the barriers (e.g. skills, price, money, physical, mental efforts, and time), people will go for things that are easier to do. It is in our nature.
If we look at where most of the disruption is happening today, it is at ease, not motivation.
Uber makes transportation simple. It does not motivate you to get in a car. To make things easier, Uber has removed price, time, and physical barriers associated with getting a cab. Uber has reduced cab fares by increasing the supply of taxis. The company has drastically decreased the waiting time; you can get an Uber in 3 minutes. Also, it has removed the need to walk a few blocks to get a cab.
Airbnb makes booking a room simple. It does not motivate people to book a room. Airbnb has also removed the price and physical barriers and has challenged the social norms. Like Uber, Airbnb as decreased the price for accommodations by creating a new market supply, homeowners. It has challenged social norms by making it socially acceptable to stay at other people's homes. Also, it removes physical barriers by providing more options.
Consider the success of Amazon, Zappos, and the other leading shopping websites. They make shopping easy and effortless. One-click purchasing outlines this strategy of increasing ability. By making a transaction easy, they have transformed the way we buy things.
You can make similar cases for Netflix, Warby Parker, Github, and Spotify.
In summary, simplicity wins in a complex world. People don’t have the time and don’t want to figure out how things work, so simplicity has become a scarce resource. Motivation, on the other, has become an abundant resource since we have all become publishers and motivators.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…