Skip to main content

The Irrational Power of Nudge Brands


Nudge brands are brands built on interactions, not attitudes.
They are mostly defined by experiences, not TV campaigns.
They are designed around people's inconsistencies and errors, not for machines.
They are simple, not complex. They like to break things into small chunks that are less daunting than big tasks.
They focus on changing behavior, not generating awareness and interest.
The Paris metro system card is a nudge brand. It is designed against human errors. You can use the card in any direction.
IKEA is a nudge brand. It uses the power of personal investment. The more involved people are in creating something, the better they feel about the end product.
Ryanair is a nudge brand. It chunks the whole purchase process. They lock you in with a low 'seat price' first to get a mental commitment. Then, they start to add the extra charges in bite-sized 'chunks.'
Hare Krishna is a nudge brand. It is built on the reciprocity rule by giving away daisies. People should repay, in kind, what another person has provided for them.
Red Nose Day is a nudge brand. It used the Benjamin Franklin Effect by asking for a favor: wearing a red nose for a day. When you ask someone for help, and they oblige, they are more willing to do you a further favor in the future than if you had been the one helping them.
Amazon and Yelp are nudge brands. They use the power of social influence through reviews to drive people's decisions. People make decisions based on what those around them are doing.
Today, brands are built through actions. Most of the videos we watch are through interactive devices. We are constantly making choices as we engage with brands. Each choice represents an opportunity to nudge, to piggyback on Richard Thaler's book. However, we are still taking the longer road, trying to create brand awareness, with the desire to generate interest and the hope to drive action. In an interactive world, we need nudge brands, built for the irrationalities of the human mind.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…