Skip to main content

Digital Inoculation: Resisting Right Wing's Persuasion

"Fake news” is not going away anytime soon. It will probably just get worse. Trump’s latest tweets are an example of this. And as our society becomes more polarized, we are likely to have more fake news and radical messages spread like forest fire because of social media. And while some people might think that fake news doesn't work, psychology, research, and current events would tell us otherwise. So why is fake news so persuasive and impactful? As humans, we are easily swayed by memorable events rather than facts. And those radical events are easier to remember, real or not. In turn, the more we remember them, the more realistic they become. 
 Adults, for the most part, are capable of forming their opinions and determining fact from fiction. But what about children? If you are a parent worried about your kid getting influenced by these messages online, what do you do? What is the best way to build resistance to false messages?
 Below are a couple of techniques for attitude inoculation with examples from the advertising and political world. 
 Establish beliefs and stimulate commitment
Make a public commitment to what you believe. A solidified belief will make you less susceptible to other people’s beliefs.
A simple 'like' on Facebook can stimulate commitment. A study done by Adam Ferrier in 2013 revealed that people who 'like' a brand on Facebook or write a comment are more likely to make a purchase and recommend the brand to friends. We reaffirm loyalties and beliefs when we cultivate and build a relationship with a brand, person or association. 
One of the best examples of this is from Obama's campaign team in 2012. As you probably remember, it was a close election; Obama won by 51.1% against Romney (47.2%). Obama's success can be attributed to many things, but to focus on one specifically: Obama and his campaign team built a relationship with voters. They asked Americans to vote, whether Democrat or Republican, they just wanted people to get out and vote. Registered voters were just asked to sign a "pledge to vote" card, which featured a subtle photo of Barack Obama. This moment, although small, increased the likelihood that the person would vote, and would vote for the Democratic Party. 
Develop counterarguments
Like an inoculation against disease, even weak arguments will prompt counterargument, which is then available for stronger attack. Having stood up for your convictions, you will become less susceptible to what other have to say. William McGuire documented this inoculation theory in a series of experiments.
In advertising, we bring counterargument to mind in response to an opponent’s ads. This technique developed by Robert Cialdini is called "The poison parasite defense" because it combines a poison (strong counterarguments) with a parasite (a retrieval cue that brings those arguments to mind when seeing an opponents ads). 
Anti-smoking ads have effectively done this. Re-creating a “Marlboro Man” commercial set in the rugged outdoors but now showing a coughing, decrepit cowboy is an example of this. 
Similarly, Sprint applied this technique by hiring the Verizon's "Can You Hear Me Now" guy as their own pitchman. Sprint's new ads combine a poison (a strong reliability counterargument) with a parasite (the pitchman that creates the retrieval cue). The wireless company now claims that its reliability is within 1 percent of that of Verizon and AT&T and leaves T-Mobile in the dust.
At the end of the day, we are humans -- slightly imperfect and fairly irrational. We are swayed more by memorable events than facts. If we want to protect people against a contaminated social environment, we need to give them the ability to do so by stimulating their mental defenses.


Popular posts from this blog

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Persuasive Simplicity, Persuasive Commerce

In a complex world, simplicity wins. In a human world, purpose sets us apart. In a complex and human world, we need persuasive simplicity to survive. Persuasive simplicity is putting simplicity in the path of motivation. It is simplicity with purpose. The Perfect Machine Today we are entrenched in a performance-marketing race. We want to make commerce as efficient as possible. We want to build the perfect commerce machine—one that knows what we like, hate, love, and need. A precise machine that doesn't spoil us with too many choices.  A nimble machine that delivers goods in hours, not days or weeks. A frictionless machine where we can order in one click, one button, one voice order, anytime, anywhere. A cost-effective machine that guarantees the best price. This machine sounds a lot like,,, and The Human World
These days, we navigate life through search. We search to eat, to learn, to travel, to date, and to find work. We search during the moments that matter on our mobile devices. Search gives us super powers. Search makes us faster and smarter, but it also gives us a taste of our average. Search engines push content based on our consumption behavior or people “like us" behavior. We have gotten trapped in the limitations of algorithmic recommendations. No surprise from discovering something we loved but didn’t expect. We watch the movies that we are supposed to watch. We dine at the restaurants that we are presumed to dine. We shop where we are expected to shop. To escape the tyranny of the average, we follow the few brave souls that are breaking the mold. People willing to defy the norm and become the tastemaker of their destiny. They are the new curators in this age of abundance. We call them influencers. They give us a search result that is imperfect, irrational, unexpected, but m…