Skip to main content

The Rise of Radical Brands


Social sentiment, ideology, and culture are manifested through different forms of communication, from graffiti to personal style to journalism. Regardless of the means, through communication, we can see how society is growing together or growing apart.
In light of recent world events, communications have shown how polarized our society has become, which is made evident through radical messaging. If there is something that we can learn from this year’s Presidential election it is that our country is more divided than ever. We are becoming a tale of two Americas. There is the red state and then there’s the blue state, both with different social, political and economics views.
And many of us are left wondering: How do these societal shifts impact brands and the way in which they communicate with a divided country?
To stay relevant brands tend to mirror popular culture, which is the dominant share of values and beliefs within society. Consequently, cultural hegemony appears in advertising, movies, books, TV shows. Historically, these forms of communication reflected cultural norms and beliefs, such as boys play with cars, motorcycles are cool, women cook and that we should obey the law. But, in recent years, we have seen a huge change in these cultural norms. To get a sense of these changes, we just have to look at the extreme views in media (e.g., Breitbart News vs. Daily Kos), TV shows (e.g., Duck Dynasty vs. Modern Family) and movies (e.g., Argo vs. The Imitation Game). As a result, brands’ age-old practice of appealing to mainstream culture through mass media no longer works because there is no longer a one size fits all for communications. And now, In order to successfully communicate to consumers, brands are forced to a pick side.
From a cultural perspective, the divide is becoming too broad in our society to play in the middle: the values that are embraced by half of the population are rejected by the other half. And since people want to engage with content that reinforces their views (creating a confirmation bias), they are more likely to pay attention to media, TV shows, books, and brands that substantiate and support their views. 
From a media perspective, digital has become the new form of mass media but on a personal level. Today, we have an infinite range of options to watch what we love, when and where we want.
Not surprising, the brands that are becoming culturally relevant with one group are distancing themselves from another. Spotify is a great example of this: post-election, the company is promoting an anthem about moving to Canada. Another example is the Camera company 360fly's off-color satire of a hypothetical Trump administration was banned by three of the four major broadcast networks. And finally, a Mexican beer maker, Tecate, premiered a commercial during the first presidential debate mocking Republican nominee Donald Trump's rhetoric and his promised wall. All of these brands are creating content that appeals to one group within society while also repelling another.

In summary, communication is a building block for our social reality. The more polarized our society is, the more brands are forced to align their messages to appeal to its buyer base

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…