Skip to main content

2017 is for Full Stack Professionals

Today’s businesses need a different type of talent to compete in a different kind of economy, one that's connected and always changing at the speed of a Google search. They need full-stack professionals, people who are good in more than one discipline, to create connections at a faster pace.
While this principle can apply to any industry, I will give you an example that is close to home: advertising.
Advertising, as in many industries, used to mirror Ford’s assembly line. We have different departments (e.g., account, creative, and planning), each one playing a different role to deliver an end product, an advertising campaign.
Digital has disrupted this model. A person armed with a smartphone has the power to ideate, plan, create, and distribute a personal or a brand story.
Today’s versions of Don Draper from Mad Men are YouTube influencers, not ad agencies. They are accounts, planners, creatives, and producers in one person. They have even managed to build a legion of followers, which provides their distribution network. We can make the same case for startups whose founders need to wear many hats.
The difference between the past and present is technology. In the past, we needed to be big to compete. Today we don’t. A team of five people can build a billion-dollar company (e.g., Whatsapp and Instagram). Small with a cross-functional team is the new big.
What does this mean for advertising? A full stack ad man or woman must be able to plan, create, and distribute stories across platforms, regardless of their role in an agency or company. Creativity is no longer for creatives. Planning is not for planners only. The account is not owned by the account executives.
This cross-functional model does not mean a break up from disciplines in an agency. We still need experts in those areas. I am just advocating for an increase in the toolbox to create more opportunities and stronger connections at a faster pace.
The challenge with becoming a full stack professional is breaking up with social norms. We are not supposed to be creative, so we don't create. Even if we try, we won’t be good at first because we don't have enough practice. Thus, we tend to avoid it all together.
I believe that people can be great at more than one thing. Change is never easy, but in the long run, it is worth the sacrifice. We will learn new skills, which will make us more competitive and independent in the digital economy. Furthermore, if we love what we do, we will have more fun doing it. Hence, go and become a full stack professional in 2017 if you are not already.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…