Skip to main content

The pursuit of irrelevance in the age of abundance and algorithms


Today, every brand wants to be a publisher. They want to be the Buzzfeed of their category. They want to generate more content, faster and cheaper, to gain attention with their audience. The problem is that people don't want more content. They want more of the things that they love (e.g., Games of Thrones, Homeland, and John Oliver), which is harder and more expensive to produce. And most brands are not making enough of that. To compete in the age of abundance and algorithms, we need to shift from churning content to creativity in real-time.
CONTENT WITHOUT CONTEXT = THE IRRELEVANT MACHINE
Content marketing is becoming a rat race for the largest part. Whoever produces more content faster and cheaper is more likely to win the race. The problem with the rat race is that even if you win, you still a rat.
Today, content is an abundant resource. Everyone is doing it; 94% of small businesses, 93% of B2Bs, and 77% of B2Cs use content marketing. Unless you are creating something unique and/or contextually relevant, you are just adding to the sea of content. According to The Content Marketing Institute, only 9% of B2B marketers consider their content marketing efforts to be "very effective."
More content does not necessarily equal more visibility. Facebook’s new algorithm rewards quality and relevant content. To further fill users’ News Feeds with articles that are of interest and relevance to them, Facebook created a new ranking algorithm that will usher in a greater amount of relevant content by tracking the time they spend reading the articles in their feeds.
CONTENT + CONTEXT = THE ABUNDANCE OF RELEVANCE
Today, the moment is the message. People live with their mobile devices. They want information that's relevant to the micro-moment. As a result, context makes the content relevant. Having information about the best burger in your block is different from getting the same info when you are about to go for lunch. One is meaningless; the other is useful. None of them break through, though.
Still, even if we make the content relevant, we are still competing with publishers and other brands doing programmatic marketing. Publishers have more authority than brands, which made them rank higher on searches. Programmatic marketing allows other brands to target people at the right moment.
This approach might get us a better response rate than traditional advertising, but we are only getting a marginal increase in performance. If we want to transform the brand, we need to add originality to the mix.
CONTENT + CONTEXT + CREATIVITY "ORIGINALITY" = CREATIVITY IN REAL TIME
The internet is about choice and immersion. When I am watching something that I love, such as an NFL game, I want to search information about the match while I am at it. I want to get a different perspective, know the players better, and check other people's comments. Content creates value; context makes it relevant; originality makes it exciting and groundbreaking.
We can use the case of the GIFERATOR to bring the point home.
Fewer people were playing the Madden NFL video game than they once did despite the fact that NFL ratings were higher than ever. Madden needed to regain its cultural relevance and connect with a new generation of football fans.
The marketing team created the Madden GIFERATOR, a real-time NFL GIF engine that generates a live stream of animated GIFs triggered by the action on TV. GIFERATOR became part of mass culture with massive adoption by fans, brands, NFL teams, and players. More than 160 media outlets piled in, quickly making it one of the year's top meme sources.
In summary, the days of being shy with content are gone. We need creativity more than ever to break through in the sea of content, but we need it made in real-time to make it relevant. Until now, we had kept these two worlds apart: the creative world and the data and tech world. Hence, our brands lived on either of these planets. Now, it is time to combine them if we want to survive in the age of abundance and algorithms.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…