Skip to main content

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there.
The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices.
The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital?
Here we have the Debate between TV and digital:
Media Consumption
TV: People are watching TV now more than ever. 
Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices.
The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast.
Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours of video per week on YouTube, social media and other free online sources, and another 8.8 hours weekly on Netflix and other subscription-video services, according to a survey fielded by digital-media firm Defy Media. That’s 2.5 hours more than the 8.2 hours weekly they spend watching television.
My Opinion: Based on media consumption habits alone, TV remains an important channel, but it is no longer the leading channel. When it comes to young viewers, a case can be made for brands to use digital, primarily or exclusively. 
Branding
TV: Mass media is more critical for building brands than digital.
Digital: Today's brands are built through active and personalized content, not passive and massive communication.
The Fact: A recent study by the McCarthy Group suggests that 84 percent of millennials do not trust traditional advertising (outright). Why? People don't like to be sold. They see advertising as being deliberately manipulative. 
My Opinion: While audience attitude applies to all media, digital can deliver a better value exchange to people through content marketing and e-commerce. TV tends to be limited to short-form content. Short form content is rarely subtle because it can’t afford to be. A comparatively significant proportion of that content is going to be dedicated to trying to “sell” whatever it is that the brand is seeking to sell. 
Scalability
TV: Television scales better than digital. Brands can reach more people at a lower cost than digital.
Digital: Today, YouTube and Facebook reach more people than any prime time show.
Others Opinion: It varies. Mark Ritson from Marketing Week has an interesting analysis on the topic. If you look only at reach and ignore time spent or use the “digital views” approach that claims an audience member as soon as they encounter three seconds of a partial, soundless video like Facebook or Instagram, then a digital video is the clear winner. If, however, you dive deeper and measure an audience on a minute by minute basis and then publish the average figure for the duration of the video the results change dramatically.
My Opinion: Reach without impact is less valuable than impact with limited reach. 
Measurements
TV: With TV, you get what you pay for as opposed to digital, which has a credibility problem.
Digital: Digital allows measurement on a more granular level than TV. People’s behavior can be followed through the purchase funnel.
The Fact: This is not an apples-to-apples comparison. TV is based on the average number of people viewing at any given minute, whereas digital video metrics depend on the platform. The major social networks don't agree on how to count video views; Facebook video view is logged when a video plays for at least three seconds, a criteria that’s aided by the fact that Facebook videos autoplay in News Feed. Snapchat views are measured differently. A view is counted as soon as the video is rendered on the screen — that means it could play for a half second and still count as a view. 
My Opinion: TV and digital both have credibility problems. Most people multitask while they are watching TV. A reach is not necessarily a reach. We can also question the veracity of a view on digital. That said; in my opinion, digital beats out TV on measurement because actual behavior on digital can be tracked versus tracking viewers mere exposure on television.
The closing
The debate should not be about the channel; it should be about the principle "mass communication versus personalized communication." Adidas moving all into digital creates a beautiful constraint for the brand. Now, they have to engage people through three inches of screen in a more intimate setting, than TV. The rules of TV do not apply to digital. Adidas will now be forced to innovate to better communicate. 

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…