Skip to main content

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love.
Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person.
Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone.
In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have. 
Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history.
YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online. 
With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like.
We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook.
For content producers, this means that a series that 80% of people like is likely to be less valuable than one 30% people love (illustratively speaking) to quote Amazon Studios Head Roy Price.
Social platforms are turning to algorithms to push content that we love and keep us on the platform as much as possible. 
Brands are moving into the world of storytelling creating long-form content. 30 seconds just isn’t enough anymore. 
Short form content is rarely subtle; it can’t afford to be. Whether it is a 30-second TV spot, 250 words of sales prose or a six-second Vine, at some point a comparatively significant proportion of that content is going to be dedicated to trying to “sell” whatever it is that the brand is seeking to sell. 
Long-form content can afford to take audiences on the scenic route, bringing them along for the ride and leaving them feeling like that haven’t been exposed to a branded message at all. 
Brands that grew up in times of scarcity, for the most part, are having a hard time adapting to this new reality.
They are not good at getting picked and producing immersive content. Brands used to pay their way through with Ads in a controlled environment. And they only developed shallow content in the form of TV spots. 
Brands that have mutated to the age of abundance behave more like "long-form" content producers. They produce original stories that people love, not just like. Immersive stories create deeper and stronger emotions with their customers. 
To bring the point home, let's look at a few of examples.
This remarkable piece of custom content profiles a typical day in the life of the world's most-decorated Olympian in history, Michael Phelps. The stunning low-light visuals and top-notch writing about Phelp's daily routine make this piece a must-see.
In partnership with The Weather Channel, Chicago-based brewery Goose Island tells the story of one of the beer's most important ingredients: the hop.
The Lego Movies
Lego has historically been very effective at brand storytelling, culminating in the release of The Lego Movies in 2014, which became a critical hit and an immense financial success, turning a $60 million budget into nearly $470 million in box office take worldwide. Now, we have the Lego Batman movie. 
Hence, the days of being timid with content are long gone. Brands can no longer pay their way with ads and average content. They need to aim for love, not likes. They have to go deep, not shallow. They must enchant, not sell. They need to get picked.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…