Skip to main content

Persuasive Simplicity, Persuasive Commerce


In a complex world, simplicity wins.
In a human world, purpose sets us apart.
In a complex and human world, we need persuasive simplicity to survive.
Persuasive simplicity is putting simplicity in the path of motivation. It is simplicity with purpose.
The Perfect Machine
Today we are entrenched in a performance-marketing race. We want to make commerce as efficient as possible.
We want to build the perfect commerce machine—one that knows what we like, hate, love, and need.
A precise machine that doesn't spoil us with too many choices. 
A nimble machine that delivers goods in hours, not days or weeks.
A frictionless machine where we can order in one click, one button, one voice order, anytime, anywhere.
A cost-effective machine that guarantees the best price.
This machine sounds a lot like Amazon.com, jet.com, hotel.com, Trulia.com and kayak.com.
The Human World
We also live in a human world. We want to be part of something bigger than ourselves.
We want a human machine built for the irrationalities of the human mind.
A machine that helps us fit in our community by providing us the latest trends.
A machine that surprises and delights us.
A machine built around human errors and imperfections.
A machine with a purpose to create a better tomorrow.
A socially responsible machine. 
A machine with a human face to warm our hearts and enlighten our souls.
This machine sounds a lot like Patagonia, Honest Tea, and Toms Shoes.
Persuasive Simplicity
Until now, commerce has lived separately, each in its own world. We have simple commerce or commerce with purpose.
As the web becomes personal, the practical and emotional worlds have a converged.
We want to shop simple, but we also want to feel good about it.
A new battlefield has emerged, persuasive simplicity.
Brands like Nike, Starbucks, and Warby Parker are good examples. They inspire us, but we still can shop simple.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Adidas kills TV. Now, let’s debate

The News: Adidas is ditching TV for digital. The company is looking to boost its e-commerce revenues from $1.06 billion in 2016 to $4.25 billion by 2020 — and Adidas wants to use digital channels to get there. The Rationale: Fish where the fish are. Younger consumers don't watch TV anymore. They spend most of their time on their mobile devices. The Controversy: Why do they want to ditch a medium that is allegedly more "critical" to the brand and that generates more sales than digital? Here we have the Debate between TV and digital: Media Consumption TV: People are watching TV now more than ever.  Digital: People are consuming media more than ever, but mostly through digital devices. The Fact: In 2017, people are projected to spend 6 hours on digital – with the majority being mobile devices - while only spending 4 hours consuming television according to the eMarketer forecast. Younger viewers watch 2.5 times more internet video than TV. Consumers aged 13-24 watch 12.1 hours …

How Cool Brands Stay Hot: Aim for Love, Not Likes

Love is an unconditional emotion while like is a more watered-down version of love. Loving someone means that he or she means everything to you while liking someone implies that you are only happy being with that person. Love involves deeper, stronger emotions, while like is more of a tender feeling towards that special someone. In a world of infinite choices, love is everything. Like is a nice to have.  Today, we live in a world of abundance, where people intent to create content surpass their time to consume it. Video content is much easier and cheaper to produce than at any other time in history. YouTube sees 400 hours of video uploaded every minute. Facebook has more than 250,000 status updates in the same span. We could never read and see everything online.  With unlimited possibilities and limited time, we pay sustainable attention to what we love and divided attention to what we like. We spend hours watching Homeland and give our divided attention to our news feed on Facebook. …

Winter and Summer in Adland

It is winter in Adland.  We have moved from a world of scarcity to a world of abundance and algorithms.  We have lost the power of influence. Trust has been severely damaged.  Consumer attention is the new bottleneck. We no longer decide who sees us. Instead, we get picked.  30 second is not enough anymore. We need to take consumers through a scenic journey to create a long lasting relationship.  Everyone is a publisher. It is easier than ever to create, but harder than ever to make a hit.  The impulse to make has far outrun the desire to consume.  New forces have emerged in the form of sophisticated algorithms.  A new model has surfaced called "pay per play,” which scored everything we do on relevance to feeding the machine. It decides what gets picked, when, and where, based on extreme relevancy.  Mass media has vanished. Precision and personalization have emerged.  It is winter in Adland. The good days are all long gone.  It is Summer in Adland We now have the power to make bra…